WWF Climate Blog

NY Times Editorial: "Where’s the Senate on This One?"

In "Where’s the Senate on This One?" (10  June 2010) the New York Times says [emphasis added]:

As early as Thursday, Americans will learn whether their senators have been paying the slightest attention to the disaster in the Gulf of Mexico. The occasion will be a vote on a mischievous and potentially destructive resolution by Lisa Murkowski, an Alaska Republican. It seeks to overturn the Environmental Protection Agency’s formal determination in 2009 that the buildup of greenhouse gases threatens public health and welfare.

That finding is the basis of E.P.A.’s authority to regulate carbon dioxide from vehicles and other sources. It is also one of the main underpinnings of the historic agreement in April to tighten fuel economy standards for the first time in more than 30 years. Repudiating the finding would cripple the E.P.A.’s ability to enforce that agreement as well as its authority to require stronger standards in the future. This is precisely the wrong thing to do in a country that needs to reduce its dependency on oil.

Ms. Murkowski’s proposal is objectionable for many other reasons. It would repudiate years of work by America’s most reputable scientists and public health experts. It would prevent the E.P.A. from regulating greenhouse gases from sources like refineries and power plants in the future. And it would send a discouraging message to a federal agency that appears to take its regulatory duties seriously, unlike the Minerals Management Service, which failed to police the oil industry.

Ms. Murkowski says she worries about oil dependency and global warming and is shocked by the gulf oil spill. She also says she would prefer that Congress pass a broad energy bill rather than handing E.P.A. “top down” regulatory authority over the economy.

President Obama would prefer a legislative solution as well. So would the E.P.A. But neither wants to unilaterally disarm the agency before Congress does something significant, on its own, about oil dependency and climate change. So far it has not.

Online Resources:

 

smokestack
Clean Air Act Under Attack - Help WWF Fight Back!

Tell Congress to oppose efforts to weaken the Clean Air Act.

Take Action Now

 

How you can help: The Senate is set to debate and vote on a climate & energy bill in the final weeks of July or early August (2010). Call your Senators and ask them to vote YES on a climate & energy bill that limits fossil fuel pollution.

Online WWF Resources Regarding U.S. Climate & Energy Policy:

 

More information on the EPA's final endangerment finding is available from EPA's Web site, including:

U.S. Senate Proposal Would Increase Oil Dependence, Cost Consumers at Gas Pump.  Press release (9 June 2010) from Environment America. 

Postings from Joe Romm of Climate Progress:

No Dirty Air Act.  Site sponsored by Clean Energy Works.

Murkowski Move an Assault on Science, Science Group Says.  Press release (21 January 2010) from the Union of Concerned Scientists.

WWF Climate Change Blog:

WWF Experts

Lou Leonard

Managing Director of Climate Change

"Our political system in America is a bit like an ocean liner…neither is good at sudden changes in direction. But there are moments in time when we must act quickly and decisively. If we are to stop the climate crisis, that time is now."

Learn more

Arctic Home

WWF and The Coca-Cola Company are working to protect the Arctic. Learn more

Evidence of Climate Change

Click the photo above to view images of the changes taking place due to climate change

Multimedia

Observations on Climate Change in the Arctic

View larger video | View more videos

Take Action

Take action through WWF's Conservation Action Network, where you can speak out for wildlife and wild places around the globe.

Read more

Protect the Future of Nature

With the only credit card that
Supports World Wildlife Fund
when you make purchases

Learn more

Bank of America will contribute $100 to WWF for each account opened & activated.