EPA Clean Air Regulations Save Lives and Money, According to New Study

  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/views/views.module on line 906.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_argument::init() should be compatible with views_handler::init(&$view, $options) in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_argument.inc on line 744.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_filter::options_validate() should be compatible with views_handler::options_validate($form, &$form_state) in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_filter.inc on line 607.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_filter::options_submit() should be compatible with views_handler::options_submit($form, &$form_state) in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_filter.inc on line 607.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_filter_boolean_operator::value_validate() should be compatible with views_handler_filter::value_validate($form, &$form_state) in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_filter_boolean_operator.inc on line 159.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/views/views.module on line 906.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/views/views.module on line 906.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/views/views.module on line 906.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/views/views.module on line 906.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/views/views.module on line 906.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/views/views.module on line 906.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/views/views.module on line 906.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/views/views.module on line 906.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_row::options_validate() should be compatible with views_plugin::options_validate(&$form, &$form_state) in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/views/plugins/views_plugin_row.inc on line 134.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_row::options_submit() should be compatible with views_plugin::options_submit(&$form, &$form_state) in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/views/plugins/views_plugin_row.inc on line 134.
  • warning: preg_match(): Compilation failed: disallowed Unicode code point (>= 0xd800 && <= 0xdfff) at offset 1811 in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/ctools/includes/cleanstring.inc on line 157.
  • warning: preg_match(): Compilation failed: disallowed Unicode code point (>= 0xd800 && <= 0xdfff) at offset 1811 in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/ctools/includes/cleanstring.inc on line 157.
  • warning: preg_match(): Compilation failed: disallowed Unicode code point (>= 0xd800 && <= 0xdfff) at offset 1811 in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/ctools/includes/cleanstring.inc on line 157.
  • warning: preg_match(): Compilation failed: disallowed Unicode code point (>= 0xd800 && <= 0xdfff) at offset 1811 in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/ctools/includes/cleanstring.inc on line 157.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/views/views.module on line 906.
  • strict warning: Declaration of calendar_plugin_display_page::options_submit() should be compatible with views_plugin_display_page::options_submit(&$form, &$form_state) in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/calendar/includes/calendar_plugin_display_page.inc on line 297.
  • strict warning: Declaration of calendar_plugin_display_page::options() should be compatible with views_object::options() in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/calendar/includes/calendar_plugin_display_page.inc on line 297.
  • strict warning: Declaration of calendar_plugin_display_block::options() should be compatible with views_object::options() in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/calendar/includes/calendar_plugin_display_block.inc on line 78.
  • strict warning: Declaration of calendar_plugin_display_attachment::options_submit() should be compatible with views_plugin_display_attachment::options_submit(&$form, &$form_state) in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/calendar/includes/calendar_plugin_display_attachment.inc on line 242.
  • strict warning: Declaration of calendar_plugin_display_attachment::options() should be compatible with views_object::options() in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/calendar/includes/calendar_plugin_display_attachment.inc on line 242.
  • strict warning: Declaration of calendar_plugin_display_ical::options_submit() should be compatible with views_plugin_display_page::options_submit(&$form, &$form_state) in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/calendar/calendar_ical/calendar_plugin_display_ical.inc on line 217.
  • strict warning: Declaration of date_handler_field_multiple::pre_render() should be compatible with content_handler_field_multiple::pre_render($values) in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/date/date/date_handler_field_multiple.inc on line 185.
  • strict warning: Declaration of date_api_argument_handler::init() should be compatible with views_handler_argument::init(&$view, &$options) in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/date/includes/date_api_argument_handler.inc on line 398.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_field_comment_username::init() should be compatible with views_handler_field::init(&$view, $options) in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/views/modules/comment/views_handler_field_comment_username.inc on line 47.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_field_comment::init() should be compatible with views_handler_field::init(&$view, $options) in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/views/modules/comment/views_handler_field_comment.inc on line 49.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_field_node_new_comments::pre_render() should be compatible with views_handler_field::pre_render($values) in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/views/modules/comment/views_handler_field_node_new_comments.inc on line 100.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_field_user::init() should be compatible with views_handler_field::init(&$view, $options) in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/views/modules/user/views_handler_field_user.inc on line 47.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_field_upload_description::init() should be compatible with views_handler_field::init(&$view, $options) in /home/wwfblogs/public_html/climate/modules/views/modules/upload/views_handler_field_upload_description.inc on line 72.

1990 Clean Air Act Amendments: Direct Benefits and Costs for 2020

Cost Benefit of Clean Air Act Amendments 

1990 Clean Air Act Amendments' primary covered pollutants: ozone, fine particles, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds. ©EPA

A new report, released by the EPA this month (March 2011), analyzes the costs and benefits from the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA) as they relate to the economy, public health and the environment. It found that the benefits from CAAA regulation far outweigh the costs by a factor of 30 to 1 with high-benefit estimates exceeding costs 90 to 1. Even low-benefit estimates found gains exceed costs 3 to 1. According to the analysis, CAAA will continue to better Americans in the near future; for the year 2020 alone, benefits will reach $2 trillion and save 230,000 people from premature death.

EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson stated, “The Clean Air Act’s decades-long track record of success has helped millions of Americans live healthier, safer and more productive lives. This report outlines the extraordinary health and economic benefits of one of our nation's most transformative environmental laws and demonstrates the power of bipartisan approaches to protecting the health of the American people from pollution in our environment."

Preventions from the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments

This chart shows the health benefits of the Clean Air Act programs that reduce levels of fine particles and Ozone. ©EPA

An interesting aspect of CAAA is that it instituted the first national cap-and-trade program which reduced sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide (primary pollutants for acid rain). The cap-and-trade system for greenhouse gases introduced in various climate and energy bills over the last half decade was modeled after this successful program.

An EPA report from late last year (Dec 2010) concluded that in 2010 alone, the acid rain program provided an estimated $120 billion in public health benefits—40 times the estimated cost. CAAA’s cap and trade program demonstrates how this system can generate pollution reductions through an efficient and market-friendly mechanism.

While these amendments now show enormous benefits to public welfare, when they were first debated naysayers predicted the cost to businesses and the economy would be too great -- much as they have argued against proposed bills to regulate greenhouse gases. Industry fought the acid rain program, saying it would cost many billions of dollars, wreck the Midwest economy (a region dependent on coal-based energy) and cause energy bills to skyrocket. Even the EPA overestimated the cost of the program (estimates were nearly double the actual cost).

The cap-and-trade acid rain program not only cost substantially less than the EPA and industry/business interests predicted, but in 2006 utility rates were 5% lower (in real dollars) than when the act passed. Job loss from the program was also substantially less than projections -- only one-fourth of the predicted job loss in the coal industry actually occurred -- and the primary cause for losses was mostly mechanization.

Industry and special interest groups have a history of significantly overestimating the costs of regulation, scaring the public and legislators. Luckily, in the case of CAAA, smart regulation prevailed, generating two decades of public benefits that are predicted to continue. Unfortunately, special interests have deterred public support and legislators from instituting a system for limiting climate change pollution and scaling up renewable energy; the cost of which will significantly hurt the economy, public health and vital ecosystems and species.

Online Sources:

 

Share this